Shout out to:

University of Connecticut




Our families, friends, professors, historians and parents

.. and Splooge.

Published on September 3, 2009 at 12:15 am  Comments (8)  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://undeadrevolution.wordpress.com/about/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

8 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. If one of you have Donofrio’s email, would you send him the following — there’s more data on those Index Data set:

    At a minimum, there should be at least the following additional data in “Index Data” set.

    DateOfInsert — Date the Index Data was created in the data set
    DateOfActivity — Date of birth/marriage
    OperatorId — The individual that inserted or updated the Index Data

    But, more importantly, there’s more data — there’s also the DBMS Log Data — they’re “Index Data” too!

    There are also data in the database management system (DBMS) logs. Those logs are archived separately, away from the Data Index files and are a true representation of every insert and update (change) ever made to that database.

    Every computer installation on the planet keeps these things forever.

    What everyone needs to remember is that someone could have changed that Index Data yesterday — or created it the day before that. The database logs will tell the tell and should be requested.

    done. Thanks, Tony.

    • With Leo working on the Chrysler dealers case with Quo Warranto, maybe others can help on this. UIPA requires computer data to be released unless doing so jeopardizes the security of the system. I can’t see how release of this info would jeopardize the security of the system. Hopefully a legal case for denied UIPA requests will be filed soon through the efforts of John Charlton. If we can get a UIPA request for the database index records in soon, any denial for them could be included in the suit.

      Do you know if somebody has requested those records? Can the ones for just Obama’s record be requested? I’m a total computer moron but have put in a lot of time and effort on finding out what I can from Hawaii.

      Obama is in Hawaii this week and I fear he is buying off judges. I also wonder if he can somehow compromise those records, if he manages to find the right person and offer them the right price.

      Also, does anybody know if those same database records for Obama’s passport file would be subject to a FOIA request?

      If somebody here can help me on any of this, please respond here or else e-mail me.


  2. I’m glad to know people from Connecticut STILL CARE about the state’s nickname…THE CONSTITUTION STATE! By the way I am a graduate of UCONN (1996, BA Communications).

    Also glad you are working with Leo D. His tireless research and efforts (including you guys) is what needs to be done. Not the tactics of Phil Berg and Orly Taitz.

  3. So when is the next segement coming? The first was excellent.

    When the idiot lawyers stop fighting among themselves and ripping off every bit of research out there to pad their egos with, then we will. It’s no surprise to us why guys like Donofrio get disgusted and take a break from it. It’s also why you don’t see many others speaking about the topic yet, whether people realize that or not, it’s true.

    We don’t appreciate the trash jobs done by so-called professionals. This is a slam-dunk subject but we feel it’s totally disrespectful to the Founders to be abused the way it has been. Anything we put out there now will only be abused in the spit-wars going on and we aren’t into it.

    Anyone seriously looking to see what we’ve got can send their email in a post here. Otherwise, it’ll be up when the immature jackasses fade out of the picture. When you’re dealing with communists, some people really need to grow up and realize what’s going on here.

    However, it’s still a work in progress with this thing. Every week we add something new to the segments from a history the commies wish we didn’t know.

    We’re not trying to act smug, it’s just that when you read some of the stuff we have, you get a strong appreciation for men who were of a higher caliber of understanding and had a better appreciation for this country and what they were attempting to achieve. The ones calling themselves Americans and trashing “dead old men” who gave more than any military in history and had more insight in their pinkies than the present people have in their entire shallow bodies, need a life and a good smack upside the head. People need to realize we have a bunch of usurpers among us that want our Constitution and history destroyed. It’s time to stop the infighting with those who don’t. This is not a “who writes the best blog post” challenge by going after well-intentioned people. This is American history the educational system has hijacked for a long time now and we’ll be damned if some lawyers are going to continue it.

    Also, the judges are clueless, so it’s not a matter of feeding them information so they can rip it apart in a court battle and take sides with the stupidity of loopholes we’ve seen so far. That’s the epitomy of not giving a crap about your country and we’ve seen that much already from so-called “keepers of the Constitution”. It’s about informing Americans who give a damn where and what we came from and why the Founders made the decisions they did and wrote the things they wrote.

    • Don’t be bothered by the Progressives trying to steal America. As for the rest of us, we are looking forward to the completion of your great and in depth research.

      As for myself I don’t need further proof of what the natural born citizen clause means because Rep. John Bingham of Ohio, considered the father of the Fourteenth Amendment, confirms the understanding and construction the framers used in regards to birthright and jurisdiction while speaking on civil rights of citizens in the House on March 9, 1866:

      [I] find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill], which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen…[6]

      And I have what the Declaration of Independence writer and 3rd President himself said on the subject in 1777:

      “We can say with confidence that a natural born citizen of the U.S. means those persons born whose father the U.S. already has an established jurisdiction over, i.e. born to father’s who are themselves citizens of the U.S.”

      They both confer that your parents have to be citizens before you are born, and that you have to be born in jurisdiction of the United States.

      As I said at the top of the post, I look forward to your in depth research, and I just wish to say Thank You.

      We apologize for the halt but promise it’ll be worth it in the end. We haven’t checked emails or the blog lately. All the free time we have has been dedicated to handing over further requests to people we’ve been after to look at it.

      Your quote is on target. It was also reiterated by Patrick Leahy when he admitted to the same language during the congressional hearing in the 110th Congress on a Resolution numbered S.R. 511 after a previous Bill numbered S. 2678 failed to pass (as well as numerous other bills failed in the past). As you’re probably aware, that resolution was a mere opinion Leahy later attempted to submit was something more. That research is credited to our friends at ZAPEM @ http://zapem.wordpress.com/2009/01/11/obama-knew-he-wasnt-eligible-for-potus/

      There’s more to this record, trust us. That Congress knew exactly what they were trying to pull. It’ll come out. Hang in there. – UR

  4. After hearing the story about the recently “rediscovered” working copy of the Constitution penned by James Wilson of Pennsylvania (http://www.philly.com/philly/news/nation_world/83321652.html?cmpid=15585797) I become more interested in this very important (yet largely unknown) founding father. As we know, he was not only a signer of the Deceleration of Independence, but he was also a signer of the Constitution and was really the 2nd most important figure behind it’s drafting, second only to Madison. Oh, and of course, was one of the first SCOTUS justice’s.

    James Wilson (as were many of the others of course) appears to have been greatly influenced by natural law and in particular Vattel’s Law of Nations. Which, as we know, is from where the founders and framers would have gotten the meaning of the term “Natural Born Citizen.”

    Hopefully, if you’ve not seen this information yet, you may find it useful.

    “James Wilson on the purpose of government and the Constitution”

    A number of his works are noted there, that I intend to get around to reading soon: “Ratification Speech” of 1787
    and a recently release compilation (& potential “treasure trove” of early information) called “Collected Works of James Wilson” by Liberty Fund Inc. (1304 pages) ISBN-10 086597683X.

    An 1804 version of “Works of James Wilson” is available online, here:

    James Wilson (1742-1798)
    Signer of the Declaration of Independence, Framer of the United States Constitution, Framer of the Pennsylvania Constitution, U.S. Supreme Court Justice , Penn’s first law professor

    I’m very much so looking forward to any updates on your research, especially with regards to The Meaning of Natural Born Citizen!

    -A “reborn” early American History enthusiast!

  5. I’m a ‘student’ of Leo D’s work as well as many others.

    You may recall my sojourn through the Courts and the ultimate rebuff for lack of ‘standing’ and Leo Ds blog on the 10th Circuits ‘dismissal in part Remand in part’…….

    Hoping to hear from you……..SLC
    I contact you today with the link to a new ‘case’ that possesses ALL of the requisite ‘elements’ of a ‘case and controversy’…..

    I am looking for a compilation of authoritative sources of ‘citizenship’ laws and practices during the period 7/4/1776 to the adoption of The Constitution as existed among the various States under the Articles of Confederation.

  6. I was disappointed to see that Leo Donofrio is “saying goodbye to this blog and the law“. I know that you did some great research that Leo featured at times on his blog. I hope that you are still keeping up the fight. Is there another blog that you recommend, now that Leo is stepping away?

    My current focus is on getting members of Congress to support and defend section 3 of the 20th amendment to the United States Constitution. They have the Constitutional duty to ensure that the President and Vice President “have qualified”.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: